|
Home
> Technology Center
> Engineering Committees
> STC Committee > Minutes
Minutes
of the Joint Soldering Technology Committee (STC), JEDEC JC13 TG9901
and the
IPC 5-23b Meeting at the Hyatt Regency San Diego Convention Center
Monday, 15 January 2001
Chairman:
Mark Kwoka
|
Name
|
PI*
|
Organization
|
|
V
|
T
|
|
Voting
members
|
| Jeff
Cannis |
M |
P |
Amkor
Technology, Inc. |
| Dave
Hillman |
M |
U |
Rockwell-Collins
|
| Mark
Kwoka |
M |
U |
Intersil |
| Gordon
Davy |
M |
U |
Northrop
Grumman |
| Maureen
Williams |
M |
G |
NIST |
| Kil-Won
Moon |
M |
G |
NIST |
| Greg
Wood |
M |
G |
American
Competitiveness Inst. |
| Doug
Romm |
M |
P |
Texas
Instruments, Inc. |
| Nancy
Reynolds |
M |
P |
Kemet
Electronics |
| George
Wenger |
M |
U |
Lucent
Technologies |
| Stephen
Todd |
M |
P |
FCI
Electronics |
|
Nonvoting
members
|
| Harry
Spence |
G |
P |
Microsemi
Corp. |
| Bill
Bennet |
G |
P |
Cypress
Semiconductor |
| Mel
Parrish |
G |
P |
NIST
|
| Don
Cullen |
G |
P |
MacDermid
Inc. |
| Del
Currier |
G |
P |
Ambitech
Inc. |
| Jim
Martin |
G |
P |
Shipley
Ronal |
| Keith
Whitlaw |
G |
P |
Shipley
Ronal |
| Bill
Russell |
G |
U |
Raytheon |
| *
PI = Participant identification: V = voting status; M = member;
G = guest; S = staff; T = participant type; P = producer; U = user;
G = general participant |
1
Committee organization and procedures
1.1 Membership and attendance
Self-introductions
were made, attendance taken, and it was determined that a quorum was
present.
1.2 Approval of
the Agenda
The Committee unanimously
accepted the Agenda as presented.
1.3 Approval of
the Minutes
The Committee unanimously
accepted the Minutes of the last meeting as written.
1.4 Review of the
Committee's scope
No review was needed.
2 Old business
2.1 Review/status of ANSI J/STD-001-C
ANSI J/STD-001-C
was published March 2000 and there has been no revision activity started
yet. IPC J-STD-001-C Handbbook and re-certification activity is underway
as reported by Mel Parrish.
2.2 Review of ANSI
J/STD-002-B
2.2.1 "Active wetting" results on new samples
Ms. Williams and
Mr. Moon presented their data(attachment 1 ) on the active wetting evaluation
using Actiec 2 flux, which are included in the charts below.
ZERO
HOURS STEAM AGE Solderability Test Results
| |
TESTER
1(45 deg
Angle, ROL0)
|
TESTER
2 (90 deg
Angle, ROL0)
|
TESTER
3 (Actiec 2)
|
| |
J Std-002A
|
“Active Wet”
|
J Std-002A
|
“Active Wet”
|
J Std-002A
|
“Active Wet”
|
|
8 ld SOIC
|
0/16 0/4
|
0/16
0/4
|
7/40 3/5
|
9/40
4/5
|
0/ 20 0/5
|
0 / 20
0 /5
|
|
44ld
MQFP
|
53 /55 5/5
|
51/55
5/5
|
2/110 1/5
|
2/110
1/5
|
55/55 5/5
|
55/55
5 /5
|
|
3 ld To-
220
|
0/15 0/5
|
0/15
0/5
|
0/15
0/5
|
0/15
0/5
|
0/15
0/5
|
0 /15
0 /5
|
|
208 ld MQFP
|
0/260 0/5
|
0/260
0/5
|
5/468 2/4
|
5/468
2/4
|
0/260 0/5
|
0/260
0 /5
|
EIGHT
HOUR STEAM AGE Solderability Test Results
| |
TESTER
1 (45 deg
Angle, ROL0)
|
TESTER
2 (90 deg
Angle, ROL0)
|
TESTER
3 (Actiec 2)
|
| |
J Std-002A
|
“Active Wet”
|
J Std-002A
|
“Active Wet”
|
J Std-002A
|
“ActiveWet”
|
|
8 ld SOIC
|
15/20 5/5
|
14/20
5/5
|
9/40
4/5
|
16/40 5/5
|
1/ 20
1/5
|
1 / 20
1/5
|
|
44 ld MQFP
|
49 /55 5/5
|
48/55
5/5
|
15/110
5/5
|
36/110 5/5
|
55/55 5/5
|
55 /55
5/5
|
|
3 ld To-220
|
6/15
3/5
|
12/15
5/5
|
0/15
0/5
|
0/15
0/5
|
0/15
0/5
|
15 /15
5/5
|
|
208 ld MQFP
|
29/260 3/5
|
92/260
5/5
|
343/520 5/5
|
422/520
5/5
|
138/260 4/5
|
190/260 5/5
|
A discussion of
these data ensued. The ROL0 flux data do show that it is likely that
more reject leads on reject units are detected using the active wetting
requirements. However, there is no difference in the overall conclusions
reached using either the active wetting or current J Std-002A requirements.
The ROL1 data (Actiec 2) indicates no difference in the overall conclusions
reached using either the active wetting or current J-STD-002A requirements
on all package styles except the 8 hour steam aged, 3 lead TO-220 cell.
While this was only one cell that did not agree, the group felt another
round of experimentation using the ROL1 flux with additional testers
would allow a resolution of this evaluation. Also, the board assembly
results using steam aged samples will be required.
ACTION ITEM: Mr.
Kwoka to send new steam aged/no steam aged samples to Mr. Hillman. Mr
Kwoka will also send new sample sets (steam/no steam) to Mssr. Wenger
and Wood along with a new test plan. Mr. Hillman to complete the steam/no
steam board assembly and present at next meeting.
2.2.2. Current Data
Summary Supporting Change to Actiec 2 Flux
1) Analysis of wetting
balance data comparing Actiec 2 with R flux from Fall '99 and Spring
'00 showed less wetting balance parameter variation with the Actiec
2 flux compared to R flux.
2) George Wenger
4 lead tabs exhibited poor solderability and were rejected during solderability
testing using both R and Actiec 2 flux . The proposed Actiec 2 flux
did not allow the poor soldering shields to pass the dip and look test.
3) NIST metal shield
data which exhibited a range of active wetting, all failed the dip and
look test using either R or Actiec 2 or Actiec 5 fluxes. Again poor
soldering shields did not pass the solderability test using the Actiec
2 flux.
4) IPC/STC/JEDEC
Joint Test Plan underway.
2.2.3 IPC 5-23b/ EIA
- STC/ JEDEC JC 13 TG9901 Joint Test Plan
Mr. Kwoka briefly
reviewed the Joint Test Plan which has been agreed to between the IPC
5-23b, EIA STC and the JEDEC JC 13 TG9901. The test plan is being run
to validate and determine choices of Solder Dwell Time(3 sec vs 5 sec),
Solder Test Flux (R vs Actiec 2) and Solder Test Temperature ( 235 vs
245 C).
Experimental units used for this study are "marginal" 44ld
MQFP, 8ld SOIC, 14ld CERDIP, 14ld PDIP, 2 ld Chip Caps. The testers
participating in the study are Kon Lin, Dave Hillman, George Wenger,
Kil-Won Moon/Maureen Williams . Kil-Wan Moon and Maureen Williams of
NIST presented their sample evaluations and presented their results
(attachment 2). George Wenger, Kil-Wan Moon and Maureen Williams have
now completed their evaluations. The results are given below. All of
these "marginal samples" pass the dip and look test using
ROL1, 235C and 5 sec test time. All other cells had some failures. We
will wait for the remainder of the testers to complete their work before
drawing any conclusions. Also the group felt that the referee board
assembly should be completed for reference.
ACTION ITEM: Mr. Kwoka to send a new joint test plan sample kit to Mr.
Wood to complete testing as tester 3. Mr Kwoka to send sufficient samples
for 240C testing to Mssr. Williams and Moon, along with extra set-up
samples. Mr. Kwoka to send sufficient samples (steam and no steam) to
Mr. Hillman. Mr. Hillman to complete joint test plan board assembly
cells and present results at next meeting.
2.2.4 Post Steam
Age Dry
A brief review of
thr Texas Instruments data, showed a 15 minute drying time is acceptable.
The group agreed to insert the post steam age drying time of 15 minutes
minimum into J-Std-002 Rev B.
2.2.5 Soldering Iron Test
Mr. Hillman conducted a poll on TechNet and had four respondents. One
out of four indicted they still used the soldering iron test. Mr. Singleton
responded via email that his company uses the test. The group agreed
to consider a draft proposal of the test method based on the IEC and
Mil-Std documents.
ACTION ITEM: Mr.
Hillman to draft a straw-man solder iron test method for the next meeting.
2.3 Lead-free testing
and requirements and STC role/responsibilities
2.3.1 Lead Free
Trends in Japan
Mr. Cannis presented a review(attachments 3,4 and 5) of the lead free
positions of various Japanese companies. He also discussed lead free
alloy patent issues.
2.3.2 New Whisker
Research
Mssr. Keith Whitlaw and Jim Martin were in attendance from Shipley Ronal.
Mr. Whitlaw presented some new research on whisker growth mechanisms.
The entirety of his presentation should be on the Shipley web site soon.
Key points were that the tin whiskers appear to be driven from compressive
stresses due to intermetallic compound growth along grain boundaries.
Annealing at 150C for 1 hour appears to mitigate whisker growth. Nickel
strike appears to eliminate whisker growth.
|
IPC/EIA/JEDEC
Joint Solderability Test Specification Design Experiment
|
|
J
Std-002 “Dip and Look” Test Method A Category 1 ( No Steam Age
)
|
|
Component
Type, I/O and Surface Finish
|
ROL0
( Type R ) 235C 3 Sec
|
ROL1
(Actiec 2 ) 235C 3 Sec
|
| |
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
|
Variable
Resistor 2 I/O Ag
|
0/10;
0/5
|
2/5;
2/5
|
|
1/10;
1/5
|
4/5;
4/5
|
|
|
SOIC
8 I/O NiPd
|
2/80;
2/5
|
0/20;
0/5
|
|
0/80;
0/5
|
0/20;
0/5
|
|
|
MQFP
44 I/O SnPb
|
3/110;
1/5
|
0/55;
0/5
|
|
0/110;0/5
|
0/55;
0/5
|
|
|
PDIP
14 I/O SnPb
|
0/70;
0/5
|
1/35;
1/5
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
1/35;
1/5
|
|
|
Cerdip
14 I/O Sn
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
| |
|
Component
Type, I/O and Surface Finish
|
ROL0
( Type R ) 235C 5 Sec
|
ROL1
(Actiec 2 ) 235C 5 Sec
|
| |
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
|
Variable
Resistor 2 I/O Ag
|
0/10;
0/5
|
1/5;
1/5
|
|
0/10;
0/5
|
0/5;
0/5
|
|
|
SOIC
8 I/O NiPd
|
0/80;
0/5
|
0/20;
0/5
|
|
0/80;
0/5
|
0/20;
0/5
|
|
|
MQFP
44 I/O SnPb
|
0/110;
0/5
|
0/55;
0/5
|
|
0/110;0/5
|
0/55;
0/5
|
|
|
PDIP
14 I/O SnPb
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
|
Cerdip
14 I/O Sn
|
0/70;
0/5
|
2/35;
1/5
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
| |
|
Component
Type, I/O and Surface Finish
|
ROL0
( Type R ) 240C 3 Sec
|
ROL1
(Actiec 2 ) 240C 3 Sec
|
| |
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
|
Variable
Resistor 2 I/O Ag
|
0/10;
0/5
|
|
|
1/10;
1/5
|
|
|
|
SOIC
8 I/O NiPd
|
0/80;
0/5
|
|
|
0/80;
0/5
|
|
|
|
MQFP
44 I/O SnPb
|
0/110;
0/5
|
|
|
0/110;0/5
|
|
|
|
PDIP
14 I/O SnPb
|
0/70;
0/5
|
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
|
|
|
Cerdip
14 I/O Sn
|
0/70;
0/5
|
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
|
|
| |
|
Component
Type, I/O and Surface Finish
|
ROL0
( Type R ) 240C 5 Sec
|
ROL1
(Actiec 2 ) 240C 5 Sec
|
| |
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
|
Variable
Resistor 2 I/O Ag
|
0/10;
0/5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOIC
8 I/O NiPd
|
0/80;
0/5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MQFP
44 I/O SnPb
|
0/110;
0/5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDIP
14 I/O SnPb
|
0/70;
0/5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cerdip
14 I/O Sn
|
0/70;
0/5
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Component
Type, I/O and Surface Finish
|
ROL0
( Type R ) 245C 3 Sec
|
ROL1
(Actiec 2 ) 245C 3 Sec
|
| |
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
|
Variable
Resistor 2 I/O Ag
|
1/10;
1/5
|
0/5;
0/5
|
|
0/10;
0/5
|
0/5;
0/5
|
|
|
SOIC
8 I/O NiPd
|
0/80;
0/5
|
0/20;
0/5
|
|
0/80;
0/5
|
0/20;
0/5
|
|
|
MQFP
44 I/O SnPb
|
0/110;
0/5
|
0/55;
0/5
|
|
0/110;0/5
|
0/55;
0/5
|
|
|
PDIP
14 I/O SnPb
|
0/70;
0/5
|
4/35;
4/5
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
5/35;
3/5
|
|
|
Cerdip
14 I/O Sn
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
| |
|
Component
Type, I/O and Surface Finish
|
ROL0
( Type R ) 245C 5 Sec
|
ROL1
(Actiec 2 ) 245C 5 Sec
|
| |
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
Tester
1
|
Tester
2
|
Tester
3
|
|
Variable
Resistor 2 I/O Ag
|
0/10;
0/5
|
0/5;
0/5
|
|
0/10;
0/5
|
0/5;
0/5
|
|
|
SOIC
8 I/O NiPd
|
0/80;
0/5
|
0/20;
0/5
|
|
0/80;
0/5
|
0/20;
0/5
|
|
|
MQFP
44 I/O SnPb
|
0/110;
0/5
|
0/55;
0/5
|
|
0/110;0/5
|
0/55;
0/5
|
|
|
PDIP
14 I/O SnPb
|
0/70;
0/5
|
9/35;
2/5
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
3/35;
2/5
|
|
|
Cerdip
14 I/O Sn
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
0/70;
0/5
|
0/35;
0/5
|
|
2.3
JEDEC Revision of Mil STD883/2003, Mil Std750/2026 and participation
in ANSI J/STD-002-B
revision
Mr. Kwoka discussed
the activities at the last JEDEC Meeting and the revision of the Joint
Test Plan which has been discussed above. Mr. Kwoka also reiterated
that the JEDEC people have been very cooperative and are working in
good faith to review the J Std-002 and adopt as much as possible the
J Std-002 into the Mil Std 883 TM 2003 and the Mil Std 750 TM 2026.
Mr Spence mentioned that the JC-14 , through Nick Lycoudes, is being
very open minded in considering the J Std-002 and will likely adopt
the J-STD-002 if it is available free through the JEDEC web site.
3 New business
There was no new
business.
4 Selection of next
meetings
The Committee overwhelming
agreed to meet on 8 October 2001 in Philadelphia, PA, at the ECA Engineering
Summit from 1-5 pm. Mr. Tinkleman will forward the meeting notice.
ACTION ITEM¾M.Tinkleman/C.Williams to make meeting arrangements
and distribute.
5 Adjournment
The Committee moved,
seconded, and unanimously agreed to adjourn at 3:00PM.
6 Action items
· Mr. Kwoka
to send new steam aged/no steam aged samples to Mr. Hillman. Mr Kwoka
will also send new sample sets (steam/no steam) to Mssr. Wenger and
Wood along with a new test plan. Mr. Hillman to complete steam/no steam
board assembly and present at next meeting.
· Mr. Kwoka to send a new joint test plan sample kit to Mr. Wood
to complete testing as tester 3. Mr Kwoka to send sufficient samples
for 240C testing to Mssr. Williams and Moon, along with extra set-up
samples. Mr. Kwoka to sufficient samples (steam and no steam) to Mr.
Hillman. Mr. Hillman to complete joint test plan board assembly cells
and present results at next meeting.
· Mr. Hillman to draft a straw-man solder iron test method for
the next meeting.
· M.Tinkleman/C.Williams to make meeting arrangements and distribute.
This meeting was
conducted in accordance with the EIA legal guidelines and the EIA manual
of organization and procedure.
Mark Kwoka, Chairperson
Signature on file
Return
to STC Main
|