|
Home > Technology Center > Engineering Committees > P-2.4 Committee > Minutes Minutes
of the P-2.4 Committee on Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors
1.0
Introductions 2.0 Committee
Organization and Procedures 2.3 Approval
of October, 2000 Meeting Minutes 3.0 New Business
3.1.2 PN 4985
- Aluminum Electrolytic Chip Capacitor with Polymer Cathode · PARAGRAPH 1. Discussion on the teleconference began addressing Paragraph 1, specifically regarding the term 'immersion' and the length of time for the recommended nominal temperature and duration. The committee unanimously agreed to pull the entire sentence out of the document. · PARAGRAPH 1. The committee unanimously agreed to modify the Maximum Temperature and duration statement by adding 'measured at the top of the part' to the end of the sentence. · PARAGRAPH 1.1 Suggested land pattern. After discussion, the committee unanimously agreed to keep the Typical land pattern depicted in the document. · PARAGRAPH 2.2 Dimensions. Discussion pursued on how to list the Size Code. The committee decided to address the two digits at the end of the code by having it determine the maximum height (H) dimension. That being the case, the table should be changed to read 7343-12 instead of -11 in the first row. The second row (H) should read 1.8±0.2 and therefore the Size Code should become 7343-20. The (H) dimension in the third row should be 2.8±0.3. The fourth row (H) dimension should read 4.0±0.3 and thus the Size Code should read 7343-43. · Since the
Chair had allotted a one-hour length for the teleconference, and the
Editor Terry Charles had some additional changes to the document from
the posted version, it was agreed that Mr. Charles would forward to
Ed Mikoski a copy of the latest file incorporating the changes that
the committee had discussed today. This would then be posted on the
ECA Website for the committee to review and prepare specific questions
to be forwarded to the Chair. Mr. Mosier will compile the comments and
will send it out to the committee so they can be placed on the agenda
for the next teleconference. He estimates that there will be approximately
a three-week period to have the members review the documents, prepare
and forward the comments. Then about a week for him to compile the comments.
Therefore, the Chair estimates that there will be another teleconference
in about a month. 5.0 Adjournment This meeting was conducted in accordance with the EIA legal guidelines and the manual of organization and procedures.
Edward F. Mikoski,
Jr., Acting Secretary
Return to P-2.4 Menu Top of Page
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |