|
Home
> Technology Center
> Engineering Committees
> JT-31 Committee > Minutes
Minutes
of JT-31 Optical Characteristics
September 26, 2002
NIST Bldg. 225, Gaithersburg, MD
|
Name
|
Organization
|
|
Attendees
|
| George
Ehemann |
Thomson
Multimedia |
| Bob
Donofrio |
Display
Device Consultants Co. |
| Edward
F. Kelley |
NIST |
| Edward
Mikoski |
EIA |
| Keith
McGuire |
Thomson
Multimedia |
|
Member
Organizations Present
|
| |
DDC |
| |
NIST |
| |
Thomson
Multimedia |
|
Member
Organizations Absent
|
| |
Philips
Display Components Co. |
| |
OSRAM
Sylvania |
| |
EIA/ECA |
1.0
Committee organization and procedures
1.1 Membership and
attendance
1.1 Welcome by George Ehemann and self- introduction of attendees. It
was determined that a quorum was present. The group felt that Philips
and Toshiba should be participants in the work of this committee. Mr.
Rowe also mentioned that the IEC PDP (Plasma Display Panels) is meeting
tomorrow. He will see if there is any interest in members there participating
in JT-31.
1.2 Approval of
JT-31 Minutes 22 May 2002 meeting in Boston, MA
Minutes from meeting of 22 May 2002 held in Boston, MA were modified
to replace "bivariant" with "bidirectional" in Section
3.1 Para. 2. Also to change '300MM' to '300mm' in the same paragraph.
The minutes were subsequently unanimously approved.
1.3 Correspondences
Correspondence was received from Bill Rowe. He sent his regrets he would
not be able to attend the meeting. He also indicated the Phosphor Registration
Template, which is posted on the ECA website in the engineering section
for JT-31, has a broken link to the file. He requested that the link
be re-established. Ed Mikoski took it as an action item.
2.0 Old Business
2.1 Status of the new electronic template for phosphor registration
The registration system on the ECA website is posted. As mentioned in
the correspondence above, the link is broken. That will be repaired
and the contact cited in the document will be changed from Bernie Aronson
to Ed Mikoski.
Discussion pursued regarding the need in the industry for the registration
of flat panel displays for phosphor backlighting and problems related
to the diffuser changing spectrum. The group sees the future need to
accurately control these items for the anticipated demands for accuracy
of image color and clarity for the e-commerce market.
It was determined
that there is also a need for standardization relative to measurement
equipment. Measurement documents need to be developed.
2.2 TEP-105-15,
Glass Aging
Bob Donofrio had recently delivered a paper in the Ukraine. It discussed
the shape of the profile of the beam and how one can measure change
where one is on the curve. This is especially pertinent to a CRT where
there are fill lines. This is not trivial to define. The subject is
covered in an article located on his website. It reviews different methods
that are used. (http://www.ddc-co.com under publications)
The group also discussed
the glass aging summary from several years ago to predict electron browning.
The document was delivered to JT-31 as Report #L4762 PRE from Corning
entitled, Quantitative Model for Prediction of Electron Browning from
CTV Panel Composition of 9/10/98 David Tammaro.
2.3 TEP-105-12 Test
Method for Tube Face Reflectance
TEP-105-12 is the existing document. The technology has evolved from
12x12x10 to 6 inches deep so the document needs to be revisited. There
should perhaps be a new sketch introduced to the document. After an
extensive discussion about correlation between methods, Ed Kelley delivered
a presentation on the Specular, Lambertian, and haze components in the
in plane BRDF (bidirectional reflectance distribution function) for
CRTs and Flat Panels and the problems associated with it. So far, there
are four measurements that are fairly robust. (This method is not designed
for an orange-peel surface.) 1) Diffuse illumination method, 2) Large
Source Specular Direction Method, 3) Ring Light Method, 4) Small Source
Specular (no robustness to this but a super small variable radius source
would work well.
The group also discussed
the concept of Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) method.
The concept of using
a knife edge or step response transition was also briefly addressed.
3.0 New Business
3.1 Phosphor Catalog TEPAC 116-C to searchable CD
Kevin Brady of NIST will look into this document as to how feasible
it is to scan and plot graphical points for converting the paper-based
curves to electronic data.
3.2 IEC 441 update
George Ehemann will discuss this document with Bill Rowe. It was felt
that we should re-establish contact with the Georgia Tech Phosphor Institute.
Specifically, a Dr. Brent Wagner and Dr. Chris Summers. The group also
deduced that Sandia Labs is working on Phosphors. George Ehemann agreed
to re-establish contact with all these individuals.
3.3 Tour of NIST
Metrology
The group visited the NIST labs in the afternoon to visually witness
the effectiveness of various optical measurements. The committee expressed
its appreciation for this opportunity.
4.0 Future Business
Meetings
4.1 The group asked that the Chair look into the feasibility of holding
the next meeting during the upcoming SID conference in Baltimore in
May or June.
.
5.0 Meeting adjourned at approximately 4:00pm.
This meeting was
conducted in accordance with the EIA Legal Guidelines and the Manual
of Organization and Procedures.
George Ehemann
, Chairperson
Ed
Mikoski , Secretary
Return
to JT-31 Main
|